Yesterday my wife sent out some emails to our friends with a link to an article that supported proposition 102. One of our friends of 15 yea...

Yesterday my wife sent out some emails to our friends with a link to an article that supported proposition 102. One of our friends of 15 yea...
Everyone needs to see this video about the effects of "legalizing" same sex marriage in Massachusetts: http://link.brightcove.com/...
This "Vote No Again" ad campaign is completely misleading. The proposition voted on in 2006 did include a definition of marriage, ...
The argument that the Supreme Court was the sole benefactor of the civil rights movement is false. The Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1968 ma...
Arizona Proposition 102 doesn't take away any rights (another misleading sound bite foisted on the easily confused by the media). It pro...
A friend dropped by the office and we had a discussion about this particular amendment. My friend couldn't understand how this whole thi...
I dropped my my office to print some materials for a fund raiser for the Arizona Democratic Party and found that the Yes on 102 sign in the ...
One of the legal functions of state approval of marriage is to determine the legal status of the children that such a marriage can produce. ...
I note that many opposed to Prop 102 can't seem to argue against the proposition without resorting to rampant anti-religious fanaticism....
Marriage and its definition are not private concerns into a private matter. Marriage is a public matter by definition, a legal contract esta...
I saw the recent TV commercial against Prop 102. It contained one fallacy after another in its presentation. Yes, the law is on the books in...
It's a shame that the AZ Republic staff can identify the ballot propositions by their names, except for Proposition 102. They call it th...